Reinterpreting Nietzsche: An Introduction to the Textist

Tandyanto, Yulius (2023) Reinterpreting Nietzsche: An Introduction to the Textist. Jurnal Filsafat, 33 (1). pp. 154-177. ISSN 0853-1870 (print); 2528-6811(online)

Text (Journal Article) Yulius-JF.pdf - Published Version Download (1MB)

Abstract

Abstract in Indonesia: Gagasan utama dari filsafat Nietzsche umumnya dirumuskan secara komprehensif oleh para kontentualis melalui konsep-konsep kunci seperti the will to power, the eternal return, dan the overman. Sayangnya, rumusan ambisius semacam itu kerap bersifat sewenang-wenang dan tidak memiliki justifikasi tekstual yang rigor. Untuk mengatasi kelemahan tersebut, kalangan tekstualis cenderung memprioritaskan pendekatan historis-kontekstual dalam menafsirkan teks-teks Nietzsche. Keunikan pendekatan tekstualis secara umum terletak pada analisis genetis dan analisis literer terhadap edisi kritis teks-teks Nietzsche yang telah disusun oleh Colli/Montinari. Karena itu, artikel ini pertama-tama menyajikan topografi singkat mengenai edisi kritis, khususnya peran KGW IX dalam analisis genetis. Selanjutnya, corak analisis genetis dan literer yang diterapkan pada aforisme BGE § 36 menjadi contoh kasus untuk memperlihatkan perbedaan tafsiran dengan kalangan kontentualis. Jika kontentualis cenderung menafsirkan hipotesis kehendak menuju kuasa sebagai esensi realitas, maka tekstualis justru memperlihatkan kreativitas Nietzsche sebagai penulis aforisme yang membuat parodi, ironi, dan satir terhadap kausalitas-kehendak serta tuntutan moral di dalam penjelasan ilmiah. Bagi tekstualis, prinsip the will to power di dalam aforisme BGE § 36 dibingkai dalam gaya bahasa pengandaian sehingga proposisi will to power juga bersifat tidak nyata. Kata kunci: Friedrich Nietzsche, edisi kritis Colli/Montinari, eKGWB, KGW IX, Contentists, Textists, Kehendak Menuju Kuasa (BGE § 36), frasa pengandaian, parodi. Abstract in English: The core of Nietzsche's philosophy is typically articulated comprehensively by contentists through key concepts such as the will to power, the eternal return, and the overman. Unfortunately, such goals are frequently arbitrary and lack rigorous textual support. Textists, on the other hand, tend to prioritize a historical-contextual approach in interpreting Nietzsche's texts in order to overcome this weakness. The textists' approach is distinguished by the genetic and literary analysis of the critical editions of Nietzsche's texts compiled by Colli/Montinari. As a result, this article begins with a brief topography of the critical editions, focusing on the role of KGW IX in genetic analysis. Furthermore, the style of genetic and literary analysis applied to aphorism 36 of BGE becomes a case study to demonstrate how the interpretation differs from that of the contentists. Textists show Nietzsche's creativity as the author of the aphorism that makes parody, irony, and satire of will-causality and moral demands in scientific explanations, whereas contentists interpret the will to power hypothesis as the essence of reality. For textists, the principle of the will to power in BGE 36 is framed in suppositional language, implying that the proposition of the will to power is also unreal. Keywords: Friedrich Nietzsche, Colli/Montinari's critical editions, eKGWB, KGW IX, Contentists, Textists, Will to Power (BGE § 36), suppositional phrase, parody.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) A General Works > B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Divisions:	Program Sarjana > Program Studi Filsafat
Depositing User:	ThM .-
Date Deposited:	26 Jun 2023 07:25
Last Modified:	26 Jun 2023 07:25
URI:	http://repo.driyarkara.ac.id/id/eprint/949

Actions (login required)

View Item